Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified? Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is no doubt that animals are vital in the scientific research on the ground that they are used in order to advance the medical knowledge. Some people believe that animals should be a part of research, while others think that animals’ lives should be respected. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss both views in detail.
The supporters of animal testing provide a variety of points in favor of their point of view. Initially, it is essential to study new drugs and test them before revealing them. Thus, animals play a valuable role in order to examine the new therapies with no threats causing damage to humans. In exemplification, the last few weeks witnessed the testing of new Ebola drugs on some monkeys, which was successful. It can be concluded that the outbreak of many diseases can have serious threats toward humanity. Hence, the best way is to use animals in order not to lose humans.
Nevertheless, the opponents of above-mentioned opinion offer their respective reasons as well. The lives of animals should be respected by human beings due to the fact that we all must have decent lives with no violations. In addition, the benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused. Animals are harshly used in some valueless trials such as experimentation for cosmetics industry. Thus, government should introduce laws with the aim of supporting animal rights so as not to push animals for more dangers. Eventually, it is clearly unacceptable for humans to violate animals on the ground that people have no right to do so.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that testing on animals violates the lives of wild animals. Yet, on condition that governments and animal rights supporters work together, then animal conservation is more likely to be achieved.
