In some countries, people are forced to retire when they reach a certain age. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Having reached the age of retirement, people have to leave their work in some countries. This phenomenon has both negative and positive outcomes which will be reviewed in this essay.
The premiere rationale of such a governmental policy is strict regulation of productivity and effectiveness of human workforce. It stands to reason that older workers may spend more time to fulfill their duties. In addition, it is often safer to keep younger staff at work where health condition and concentration matter. For example, work at the conveyor typically requires sharp reaction, good eyesight and physical endurance that people commonly lose with years. If factories did not force the old to retire, the likelihood of emergencies at the workplace due to human factor would keep fairly great.
On the debit side, companies often underestimate the skills, knowledge and potential of experienced workers at the age of retirement though they still might be helpful and have professional flair. They could offer advice about specifics that they dealt with for the most part of their lives. A good example of this statement could be medical professionals whose experience is evidently more valuable than fresh blood of newly hired interns.
Taking into account these substantial facts, it can be concluded that forced retirement is reasonable when it comes to safety issues in the working environment and effective accomplishment of assigned tasks. This practice, however, does not consider benefits of keeping experienced employees such as using their knowledge and abilities in profound matters that demand in-depth analysis and ingenuity.
