IELTS Discuss Views Essay: Technology Topics with Sample Answers

Model Answer

There is no doubt that modern technology is reshaping our world and influencing every facet of human life. Many argue that the chasm between the rich and the poor is widening as a result of technological progress. Others believe that technology serves to bridge this divide. In this essay, I will explore both viewpoints before presenting my stance.

Supporters of the view that technology exacerbates inequality present several compelling arguments. Chief among them is the rise of automation. As machines and software replace human labor, especially in low-skill sectors, many people from lower-income backgrounds find it harder to secure jobs. As the cycle continues, competition intensifies, and wages stagnate or decline. Moreover, technology has redefined basic needs, and access to smartphones and internet services is essential for participating in society. This shift imposes an additional financial burden on the poor classes, often compelling them to incur debt to satisfy these newfound requirements.

On the other hand, I believe this argument against technology overlooks key benefits. One of the clearest examples is the internet, which has enabled many individuals from modest backgrounds to build successful businesses or careers, including becoming online entrepreneurs or tech innovators. Furthermore, significant advancements in agricultural technology have substantially enhanced food production, making it more affordable and accessible to a broader population. Finally, the strategic application of technology has markedly boosted worker productivity, leading to increased compensation and salaries across various sectors.

In conclusion, while technology can present new challenges, its role in reducing inequality should not be underestimated. From improving access to food to opening up new income streams and increasing productivity, it offers powerful tools for closing the wealth gap if used wisely and inclusively.

Model Answer

In today’s digital age, the widespread availability of free music online has sparked debate. Some believe this trend supports artists and listeners alike, while others argue it negatively impacts the music industry’s sustainability. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting a personal viewpoint.

On one hand, downloading free music offers several key benefits. For emerging artists, it acts as a gateway to global exposure. Without needing the backing of a major record label, musicians can reach millions through platforms like SoundCloud, Spotify, or YouTube, where free access often translates into fan growth, live performance bookings, and even record deals. For example, artists like Justin Bieber and Billie Eilish gained massive popularity through free content shared online. Additionally, listeners especially in developing countries can access a diverse range of music they may not afford otherwise, promoting cultural exchange and appreciation.

On the other hand, critics argue that this trend severely undermines the financial backbone of the music industry. Producing high-quality music requires significant investment in time, talent, and resources. When music is downloaded for free without royalties, both, independent artists and major producers lose revenue. For instance, album sales have drastically fallen in the last decade, forcing many artists to rely solely on touring or brand sponsorships, which are not viable options for everyone. This trend further threatens long-term creative output and job security in the industry. Many artists have reported going bankrupt even suffering from severe mental health issues.

In conclusion, while free music downloads have democratized access and created new opportunities for artists, they also pose real financial challenges. In my opinion, the solution lies in legal, affordable streaming platforms that balance accessibility with fair compensation. This will ensure that both listeners and creators benefit in a sustainable way.