IELTS Discuss Views Essay: Transportation Topics with Sample Answers

Model Answer

In many countries, there is an ongoing debate about whether substantial financial resources should be allocated to constructing high-speed rail networks between cities or improving existing public transportation systems. From my perspective, prioritizing the development of new high-speed rail networks is a more beneficial approach.

One of the main reasons people support investing in current public transport systems is cost-effectiveness. Renovating existing rail lines or other forms of public transport can be done relatively quickly and requires less financial outlay compared to constructing entirely new infrastructures. Furthermore, enhancing the comfort and reliability of current services could immediately improve the daily commute for many people. For instance, cities could implement modernized ticketing systems, increase the frequency of services, or introduce new trains with better facilities. These upgrades, though not as transformative, can help to address existing transportation problems without the financial burden of a brand-new system.

On the other hand, building high-speed rail lines offers more substantial long-term benefits. High-speed trains can significantly reduce travel time between cities, promoting both economic development and social connectivity. For example, the high-speed rail network in Japan has not only transformed transportation but also fostered regional development by linking major cities more efficiently. Though this approach requires considerable initial investment, the long-term returns—through increased productivity, more tourism, and the creation of jobs—are invaluable.

In conclusion, while improving existing public transport systems has its merits, the construction of high-speed rail networks offers far-reaching advantages that can boost economic growth and enhance the overall quality of life. Despite the high upfront costs, investing in such infrastructure is a wise choice for future generations.

Model Answer

Over the past few years, our lives have been revolutionized by the emergence of various modes of transportation. Some individuals believe that cars play a vital role in modern society due to their convenience; however others argue that they are detrimental to both individuals and society. In my opinion, there is no definitive answer to this debate.

On one hand, it is crucial to recognize that cars have significantly transformed our lifestyles. The most compelling argument in favor of this perspective is that, due to their accessibility and perceived safety, many people own cars and utilize them frequently. Nevertheless, cars also contribute to the deterioration of public health, as numerous studies have consistently shown that individuals who rely heavily on automobiles are more susceptible to cardiovascular diseases. In other words, they fail to counteract the detrimental effects of a sedentary lifestyle.

On the other hand, cycling presents a viable alternative that could reduce the problems associated with excessive car use. Advocates of cycling often argue that bicycles are environmentally friendly and beneficial for health. This viewpoint is supported by the fact that bicycles do not emit harmful pollutants that contribute to environmental degradation. Additionally, bicycles can help mitigate traffic congestion, as they occupy significantly less space compared to cars. However, cycling also has its drawbacks, such as being less practical for long distances or in adverse weather conditions, which may limit its feasibility for some individuals.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that there is no straightforward answer to this question. I think that cars should be reserved for the elderly, those with disabilities, and families, while younger generations should increasingly rely on bicycles. If the public were made aware of the issues surrounding automotive use, many more individuals would consider healthier alternatives.