IELTS Discuss Essay Gender Equality

Gender equality remains a relevant and widely discussed theme in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2, often appearing in questions related to workplace roles, education access, parenting responsibilities, and gender representation in leadership. Candidates may be asked to discuss whether men and women should receive equal pay, if certain jobs are more suitable for one gender, or whether governments should enforce gender quotas in politics. Other subtopics might include debates on shared parental leave policies, the role of education in promoting gender equity, or whether traditional gender roles still have a place in modern society. Preparing ideas and arguments around these areas can help test-takers feel confident when tackling such questions.

Use Benchmark IELTS Writing Correction service to write error-free IELTS Essays, Letters & Reports.

Task There are less female leaders than male leaders in history. Why is this? Do you think that this will change in the future?

How to approach the essay:

 How to Approach the Essay:

  • Understand the Question: Break the question into two parts: why there have been fewer female leaders historically and whether this will change in the future. You must discuss both.
Body Paragraph 1: Historical Male Dominance in LeadershipBody Paragraph 2: Emerging Female Leadership in Modern Times
• Men seen as naturally assertive, often taking leadership roles since prehistoric times.
• Traditional gender roles (e.g., men as hunters, women in domestic roles) reinforced male authority.
• Male-dominated fields (e.g., military, politics) excluded women historically, as seen in leaders like Napoleon.
• Examples like Sheikh Hasina (Bangladesh) and Jacinda Ardern (New Zealand) show women excelling in leadership today.
• Women leaders are increasingly recognized for qualities like empathy, communication, and inclusive governance.
• These modern examples challenge outdated beliefs and pave the way for greater gender equality in leadership roles.
  • Take a Clear Position: In your conclusion, express your opinion clearly—do you believe this trend will continue, and why?

Model Answer

If we look back through history, it becomes evident that leadership roles have been largely dominated by men, leading to a noticeable gender imbalance in positions of power. The reasons for this disparity are multifaceted and deserve careful consideration.

To begin with, it is often argued that men have a natural tendency toward assertiveness, which has historically positioned them as natural leaders. For instance, in prehistoric societies, men were primarily responsible for hunting, while women tended to domestic responsibilities. This division of labor not only reinforced traditional gender roles but also gave men a head start in establishing authority and influence within their communities. Even in more recent history, figures such as Napoleon Bonaparte rose to prominence in the male-dominated military and political spheres—domains where female participation was either limited or entirely excluded by social norms.

Nevertheless, modern developments suggest that this pattern is gradually changing. A notable example is Sheikh Hasina, the ex-Prime Minister of Bangladesh, who successfully led her nation from the status of a developing country to that of a middle-income nation. Her leadership challenged the long-held belief that women are less capable leaders than their male counterparts. Similarly, New Zealand’s former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern gained international recognition for her empathetic and decisive leadership, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, earning praise for her communication skills and inclusive governance.

In conclusion, while history has favored men in leadership due to traditional roles and societal expectations, this is no longer a valid measure of capability. As trailblazers like Sheikh Hasina continue to break barriers, they redefine what leadership looks like and inspire a more inclusive future. With more opportunities and support, women are not just catching up—they are helping to reshape the leadership landscape altogether.

Commentary

 Commentary
Essay Question: There are fewer female leaders than male leaders in history. Why is this? Do you think that this will change in the future?

 Introduction

  • Clarity: Yes, the topic is introduced clearly by highlighting the historical male dominance in leadership.
  • Thesis: Effectively presents both the reason for the issue and the writer’s view that change is occurring.

Body Paragraphs
Main Ideas (Pros/Cons):

  • Traditional gender roles gave men a leadership edge (e.g. hunters vs. homemakers).
  • Women historically excluded from key areas like military and politics.
  • Modern female leaders show change (e.g. Sheikh Hasina, Jacinda Ardern).
  • Society now offers more chances for women in leadership.

Coherence:

  • Balanced development of both the historical context and future outlook.
  • Logical progression with smooth transitions between past and present perspectives.

 Conclusion

  • Summary: Effectively reiterates key arguments and offers a forward-looking opinion.
  • Reflection: The conclusion is more engaging than formulaic, with a positive tone about evolving gender dynamics in leadership.

 Vocabulary & Grammar
High-Level Vocabulary:

  • Assertiveness – confidence and forcefulness.
  • Reinforced – strengthened or supported.
  • Prominence – importance or fame.
  • Empathetic – showing understanding of others’ feelings.
  • Inclusive – not excluding any group of people.

Academic Phrases:

  • “It becomes evident that…”
  • “This division of labor not only… but also…”
  • “Modern developments suggest that…”

Complex Sentences:

  • “This division of labor not only reinforced traditional gender roles but also gave men a head start in establishing authority…”
  • “Her leadership challenged the long-held belief that women are less capable leaders than their male counterparts…”

Task 2

In some countries, people believe women should have the same rights as men, including working in roles like the police or army. Others argue these jobs are unsuitable for women. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

How to approach the essay:

How to Approach the Essay:

Understand the Task: Identify the two views — one supports equal rights for women in security roles like police or army; the other believes these jobs are unsuitable for women. You’re asked to discuss both and give your opinion.

Paragraph Structure:

Body Paragraph 1: Arguments for Including Women in National ServiceBody Paragraph 2: Arguments Against or Challenges to Women in Defence Roles
• Women outnumber men in many countries – excluding them wastes national human resources.
• Women excel at multitasking and can perform well under pressure.
• Female officers are often less corrupt and show strong duty ethics.
• Biological differences may limit women in physically demanding defence jobs.
• Hormonal factors (e.g. pregnancy, menstrual cycles) may impact decision-making and physical performance.
• British Army (2018) study: female recruits had higher rates of stress fractures during intense training, requiring tailored approaches.
  • Include Opinion: Clearly state your stance in the introduction and reinforce it in the conclusion.
  • Use Examples: Real-world evidence adds strength — e.g., female leadership, military studies. Aim for a balanced and well-reasoned argument.

Model Answer

It is often argued that gender equality should be prioritized in the global workforce, particularly in roles such as police officers and military personnel. Conversely, some argue that national service is predominantly a male domain. I firmly believe that women can demonstrate capabilities equal to those of men in serving their nations. This essay will explore the benefits and challenges of including women in defence roles.

A key argument supporting equal access to national service is that, in many countries, women statistically outnumber men; thus, excluding them could lead to higher unemployment rates and underutilization of human resources. Furthermore, women often possess superior multitasking abilities compared to men, which can be valuable in high-pressure environments such as defence. In fact, studies and real-world examples have shown that women in such roles can be less prone to corruption and demonstrate a strong sense of duty, further reinforcing their suitability for these critical positions.

On the other hand, some argue that biological differences between men and women may limit women’s effectiveness in the physically demanding jobs of army and police officers. For instance, hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy and menstrual cycles can adversely affect decision-making skills and physical strength, both of which are essential. Another case in point is the British Army’s 2018 internal study, which reported that female recruits were more likely to suffer stress fractures and other training-related injuries during intense physical drills, highlighting the need for tailored training approaches based on physiological differences.

In conclusion, I still believe that the advantages of incorporating female personnel into defense authorities undoubtedly outweigh the disadvantages. To underestimate a woman’s intelligence and capabilities in today’s world is a grave error. By encouraging equal participation, societies not only promote fairness but also unlock a broader range of talent essential for national progress.

Commentary

Essay Question:
In some countries, people believe women should have the same rights as men, including working in roles like the police or army. Others argue these jobs are unsuitable for women. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Introduction

  • Clarity: The topic is introduced clearly, with both sides of the argument outlined.

Thesis: The writer expresses their stance, supporting gender equality and the capability of women in defense roles.

Body Paragraphs

Main Ideas (Pros/Cons):

Pros:

  • Women outnumber men, so excluding them could raise unemployment and waste resources.
  • Women excel in multitasking, making them valuable in defense roles.
  • Studies show women may be less corrupt and more patriotic in such roles.

Cons:

  • Biological differences (e.g., hormonal fluctuations) may affect decision-making and physical strength in demanding roles.
  • A British Army study found that female recruits experience more stress fractures and injuries in physical training.

Coherence:

  • The essay covers both views well, presenting a balanced argument with smooth transitions.
  • The structure is logical, starting with the benefits of women in defense, followed by the challenges.

Conclusion

Summary:

The conclusion effectively summarizes the key points, reinforcing the writer’s opinion that the advantages of female inclusion outweigh the disadvantages.
The writer’s stance on gender equality in defense is clear, and the conclusion ties back to the essay’s main argument.

Vocabulary & Grammar

High-Level Vocabulary:

  • Multitasking (ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously)
  • Underutilization (failure to use something to its full potential)
  • Patriotic (having or showing love for one’s country)
  • Exclusion (the state of being left out)

Academic Phrases:

  • “In fact,”
  • “On the other hand,”
  • ” It is often argued that “
  • “This essay will explore both the benefits and challenges of…”

Complex Sentences:

  • “For instance, hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy and menstrual cycles can adversely affect decision-making skills and physical strength, both of which are essential.”
  • “By encouraging equal participation, societies not only promote fairness but also unlock a broader range of talent essential for national progress.”

 

error: Content is protected !!