IELTS Agree or Disagree Essay: Technology Topics with Sample Answers

Model AnswerIt is clear that high-tech gadgets have a strong impact on our daily lives. However, there is growing concern regarding their adverse effects on the reading and writing skills of young people. I fully agree with this view.

On one hand, the use of computers and mobile phones brings several benefits. Firstly, these devices provide access to a wide range of information, thereby enhancing the knowledge base of young learners. Furthermore, for those learning a second language, technology can be a helpful tool that encourages daily reading and builds vocabulary. The rise of social networking platforms also enables individuals to create blogs, providing them with a medium to articulate their thoughts. Regular writing practice through these platforms contributes to the improvement of their writing skills.

On the other hand, it is true that these gadgets negatively impact the reading and writing abilities of youth. Young individuals who communicate via applications such as Facebook or Skype often resort to abbreviations to expedite their conversations. Moreover, software programs like Microsoft Word offer convenient features that automatically correct grammatical errors when drafting text documents. While these functionalities may streamline communication, they may prevent users from learning proper grammar themselves. Lastly, many teenagers devote their time to playing video games or watching entertaining content, which reduces their interest in books and newspapers. Alarmingly, this trend may lead to a lack of familiarity with academic texts, resulting in boredom due to the oversized screens and relatively large fonts they are accustomed to.

In conclusion, although modern devices provide us with valuable information and convenience, I agree that mobile phones and computers hurt the reading and writing skills of the younger generation.

Model AnswerIn contemporary society, the unauthorized use of copyrighted materials—such as music, films, and literature—has become increasingly prevalent, leading to significant financial losses for the original creators. I believe that this trend is harmful, as it undermines the livelihoods of artists and erodes the cultural fabric of society.

To begin with, artists rely on their creative works for their livelihoods, which are often characterized by irregular income streams. When musicians, filmmakers, and authors release their creations, the unrestricted access to these works without compensation can force them to deplete their savings to meet daily expenses. This precarious financial situation not only jeopardizes their current well-being but also adversely impacts their future artistic endeavors, as insufficient funding can stifle creativity and innovation. When their works are undervalued and disseminated without due consideration, artists may experience a loss of motivation and purpose, exacerbated by the pressures of feeling unappreciated.

Furthermore, the rampant unauthorized use of copyrighted materials threatens the unique traditions and identities of individual nations. If cultural products are freely accessed without remuneration, the distinctiveness of each country’s artistic heritage may be compromised, leading to a homogenized global culture devoid of diversity. Such a scenario could foster misunderstandings and animosities among nations. For instance, traditional music from countries like India or Brazil is often remixed or used in international media without credit or payment, which not only disrespects the original creators but also strips the work of its cultural roots and meaning.

In conclusion, the work of artists and the originality of their creations must be respected and protected. Governments should implement and reinforce copyright laws to reduce the widespread illegal distribution of music, films, and books, thereby safeguarding the livelihoods of artists and preserving the rich tapestry of cultural diversity.